#Liveprofessor review driver

#Liveprofessor review driver

UFX+ 205 samples, 4.271ms, 48kHz, 64 samples (1.3ms) (<- only 1 sample more compared to ASIO driver (204) UFX+ 193 samples, 4.021ms, 48kHz, 64 samples (1.3ms) (<- I regard these results as invalid) If the AD/DA converter are not being used when enabling loopback, then I would expect to have latency savings in the range of the total converter latency, which is 1,48ms for the UC (AD and DA). Especially with the UC I don't understand that, because according to the manual the latency of the AD and DA converters is significantly higher. Is there an explaination for these unexpected results?ģ- I don't understand why the RTL decreases by only 0.5ms when using loopback for the UC and I also get the same result. I ensured to use the same sample rate of 48kHz and the same ASIO buffersize of 64. However, during the measurements I got strange and unexpected results:ġ- the measurement results for the RTL varied very unexpectedly between 2 values on my UFX+, I tried this on 2 different analog ports (AN7 and AN8 IN/OUT) and with the last three releases of RTL Utility (0.5.2, 0.5.1, 0.4.11).Ģ- the RTL of the UFX+ (4.25ms) was unexpectedly even worse compared to the much older UC (4.0ms) despite of it's much faster AD/DA converters. Rephrased to make it easier to (Adrian, Joost): I found your Youtube video very interesting and I'm thinking about refining my setup.